Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet Benchmarks Beat GPT-4: What Changed
Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms GPT-4 on key benchmarks—technical analysis of improvements and implications for agent builders.
The News: Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet now outperforms GPT-4 on multiple benchmarks: MMLU (88.7% vs 86.4%), HumanEval coding (92% vs 67%), and instruction following.
Key Improvements:
1. Coding capability leap
HumanEval: 92% (Claude 3.5) vs 67% (GPT-4)
Agents writing code, API calls, or data transformations benefit significantly.
2. Instruction following
Better at following complex multi-step instructions without hallucinating steps.
3. Context coherence
200K token context window with better retention across full context vs GPT-4's 128K.
Implications for Agent Builders:
Switch to Claude 3.5 if:
- Agent writes code or SQL queries
- Long documents (>50K tokens)
- Complex instruction chains
- Cost-sensitive (3x cheaper than GPT-4)
Stick with GPT-4 if:
- Heavily invested in OpenAI ecosystem
- Using GPT-4V (vision) capabilities
- Function calling maturity critical
Real-world test (support agent classification):
- Claude 3.5: 91% accuracy, 1.6s latency, £14/1K queries
- GPT-4 Turbo: 89% accuracy, 1.8s latency, £18/1K queries
Claude wins on all three metrics.
Sources:
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Announcement
More from the blog
OpenHelm vs runCLAUDErun: Which Claude Code Scheduler Is Right for You?
A direct comparison of the two most popular Claude Code schedulers, how each works, what each costs, and which fits your workflow.
Claude Code vs Cursor Pro: Real Developer Cost Comparison
An honest look at what developers actually spend on Claude Code, Cursor Pro, and GitHub Copilot, and how to get the most from each.
Stop doing the work around the work
OpenHelm connects to your tools, reads the context, and does the steps, so you sign off on the result instead of producing it. See how it covers an entire role’s weekly workload, check the pricing, or run it yourself with the free local app.